feeicon.pages.dev

Gay dating and domestic violence on college campuses

All rights reserved. Accordingly, when developing programs and services, practitioners and college health professionals must strive for inclusivity, as well as develop targeted approaches for outreach to populations on their campuses, which may be at greater risk. 1 The largest variance inflation factor VIF in any of the various models was 1. Cercone, J. 2 Findings indicate that males, however, have a greater risk of other types of abuse. The wheel diagrams how abusers enact power and control through the techniques and actions listed in each segment e. 3 Sexual minority females did not see an increased risk of victimization for sexual harassment. Findings indicate that males, however, have a greater risk of other types of abuse. 4 Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74, Westport, CT: Praeger. 5 As discussed in the introduction, a variety of control variables were included due to prior research that has found a relationship between these variables and victimization. Research suggests that young adults between ages 18 - 24 experience the highest rates of IPV, and that college students are at an increased risk for some forms of IPV e. 6 Journal of Family Violence, 25, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 7 Carvalho, A. Edwards, K. 8 Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) college students experience disproportionate rates of intimate partner violence (IPV) compared with their. This was an area of victimization the current study could not examine. 9 “The social norms approach provides a theory of human behavior that has important implications for health promotion and prevention. Abused Women or Abused Men? 10

Copyright ©feeicon.pages.dev 2025